Skip to content
services/Technical Due Diligence

Technical due diligence - clarity before commitment

Senior-only technology due diligence for investors and M&A teams. Scoped from your thesis, not a checklist. Written for the operator on day one - not filed after signing. And uniquely: the same team that assesses the target stays involved through post-close execution.

Talk to us about your deal
Technical due diligence - clarity before commitment

Who we work with

We conduct software due diligence for PE firms, venture capital investors, and corporate M&A teams evaluating software-led acquisition targets. We also support founders preparing for technical due diligence for startups - where incoming investor scrutiny can make or break a round. The situations we are most often called into: a target whose technology platform is central to the commercial thesis; a deal where the CTO is a flight risk post-close; a pre-investment tech assessment where AI or proprietary data claims have not been independently verified; and acquisitions requiring post-close platform integration where understanding the architecture before signing saves months afterwards.

48 hrs

Time to scoped engagement from first conversation

2-4 wks

Typical engagement duration - compressible to 10 days for time-critical processes

500+

Senior engineers in our network - no junior analysts running a checklist

Critical components of tech assessment for M&A

Architecture & scalability

Platform design, infrastructure setup, cloud environment, resilience, and single points of failure - evaluated in the context of growth, roadmap plans, and long-term maintainability. Can this platform support your thesis? A platform that supports 5,000 users cannot always support 50,000.

Code quality & technical debt assessment

Codebase structure, test coverage, documentation, dependency management, and framework currency - reviewed to understand maintainability, hidden risk, and how much effort future delivery may require. How much invisible cost did you just buy?

Security, compliance & due diligence cybersecurity review

Access controls, data handling, encryption, incident history, GDPR posture, and sector-specific regulatory exposure. What liabilities did not appear in the data room? Security debt rarely appears in financial statements. A single undisclosed breach history can reset deal economics entirely.

Team & key-person risk

Engineering team structure, seniority distribution, retention signals, CTO flight risk, and knowledge concentration. What happens if two people leave? Most technology risk resolves to team risk. The architecture only matters if someone can maintain and extend it after close.

AI & proprietary claims

Validation of AI, ML, and data advantage claims. Distance between prototype and production-grade capability. Is this differentiation real? AI claims in data rooms are increasingly common and increasingly loose. We assess what is genuinely defensible versus what is a slide deck.

Integration & roadmap feasibility

Third-party integrations, API dependencies, integration scoping for bolt-on acquisitions, and roadmap effort estimates. What does post-close actually cost to execute? Integration is almost always underestimated. Pre-close scoping saves months and materially affects the value-creation plan.

Code review due diligence - four steps, deal-speed execution

Most engagements are scoped and started within 48 hours of first contact. Here is what happens between that call and the report on your desk.

1. Thesis alignment - before scoping begins

We start by understanding your commercial case: what the technology platform needs to prove, what you are most concerned about, and which risks would be dealbreakers versus acceptable. Every software architecture assessment we run flows from this conversation - not from a standard checklist. This 30-minute call eliminates scope misalignment and ensures the output is useful from day one.

2. Assessment - senior-only, access-driven

Architecture, codebase, infrastructure, security, team, AI claims, integrations - assessed by senior engineers with commercial judgement, not junior analysts running a template. We request appropriate access and move fast. Standard engagements run two to four weeks. For compressed processes, we can deliver a focused technical risk assessment in ten days.

3. Report and debrief - written for the operator, not the IC

A risk register tied to the thesis. A first-hundred-days stabilisation outline. A live debrief where the deal team can pressure-test every finding. The deliverable is designed to hand to a portfolio company operator on day one - not to be filed and forgotten after signing. Ours is written to be used, not to protect the deal team.

4. Post-close continuity - same team, no ramp-up

If you want the same senior team to carry findings into post-close execution - stabilisation, team augmentation, platform modernisation - we structure that before signing. No rebid. No new vendor. No months of rediscovery. The pre-investment tech assessment becomes the first stage of the value-creation plan.

Technology risk is cheaper to understand before signing than after.

Whether you are in active technology due diligence for investors, evaluating a target pre-LOI, or supporting a portfolio company preparing for exit - we scope and start tech assessment for M&A at deal speed. Most engagements begin within 48 hours.

Talk to us about your deal ->
Hippo Manager

We’ve been consistently impressed by the quality of their technical talent.

Andrew Page

Andrew PageCEO of Hippo Manager

Why investors choose our technical risk assessment

Four differences that matter when the deal is live and the clock is running.

Scoped from the thesis, not a template

Before we assess anything, we agree with the deal team on what the technology workstream needs to prove or disprove. IT infrastructure evaluation is not a question. 'Can this infrastructure support the geographic expansion in years two and three at the margin levels in the model' is. Every finding maps back to the commercial case.

Senior-only execution - commercial judgement throughout

Large DD firms deploy senior partners to pitch and debrief, with the actual work done by junior staff running a codebase audit services checklist. We do not. Every engagement is led and executed by senior engineers with experience building, scaling, or acquiring comparable businesses. The judgement calls are made by people qualified to make them.

Continuity - the most underused lever in PE tech DD

The people who spend three weeks understanding a target's architecture, team, and risks are the best-positioned people to lead execution after close. We preserve that continuity by design. For due diligence for venture capital and PE alike, this eliminates the rediscovery period that silently destroys the first 60-90 days of value creation.

Due diligence cybersecurity review and full assessment at deal speed

We scope and start within 48 hours of first contact. Standard engagements run two to four weeks. For time-constrained processes, we deliver a focused technology stack evaluation and risk register in ten days without reducing the seniority of the team doing the work. We move at the pace your process requires.

Tell us what you need. We'll find the right engineers.

Whether you need senior developers embedded in your team, a Fractional CTO, or a technology assessment before a deal — most engagements start within 2–4 weeks.

Or email us directly at post@devspace.no to get a free consultation.

optional